SOE
Chow Institute
User Center
中
EN
About WISE
People
Committee of Academic Consultants
Faculty Directory
Staff Directory
Research
Publications
Working Papers
Facilities&Centers
Education
Overview
Undergraduate Programs
Graduate Programs
Study-Abroad MA Programs
Exchange Programs
Executive Education
News & Events
News
Announcements
Conferences
Seminars & Conferences
Job Openings
SOE
Chow Institute
User Center
中
EN
About WISE
Introduction to WISE
Contact Us
Map and Direction
People
Committee of Academic Consultants
Faculty Directory
Staff Directory
Research
Publications
Working Papers
Facilities&Centers
Education
Overview
Undergraduate Programs
Graduate Programs
Study-Abroad MA Programs
Exchange Programs
Executive Education
News & Events
News
Announcements
Conferences
Seminars & Conferences
Job Openings
Research
Home
->
Research
->
Working Papers
->
Content
Research
Publications
Working Papers
Facilities&Centers
Finance & Economics Experimental Lab
MOE Key Lab in Econometrics
Fujian Provincial Key Lab in Statistics
Center for Econometrics Research
Center for Financial Research
Center for Research in Labor Economics
Center for Macroeconomics Research
Center for Statistics Research
Center for Information Technology
SAS Center for Excellence in Econometrics
High-Speed Computing Cluster
An Experimental Investigation of Auctions and Bargaining in Procurement
Id:2055
Date:20131014
Status:published
ClickTimes:
作者
Jason Shachat, Lijia Tan
正文
In reverse auctions, buyers often retain the right to bargain further concessions from the winner. The optimal form of such procurement is an English auction followed by an auctioneer's option to engage in ultimatum bargaining with the winner. We study behavior and performance in this procurement format using a laboratory experiment. Sellers closely follow the equilibrium strategy of exiting the auction at their costs and then accepting strictly profitable offers. Buyers generally exercise their option to bargain according to their equilibrium strategy, but their take-it-or-leave-it o ers vary positively with auction prices when they should be invariant. We explain this deviation by modeling buyers' subjective posteriors regarding the winners' costs as distortions, calculated using a formulation of probability weighting, of the Bayesian posteriors. We show alternative models based upon risk aversion and anticipated regret can't explain these price dependencies.
JEL-Codes:
C34; C92; D03; D44
关键词:
Auction, Bargaining, Experiment, Subjective Posterior
TOP