SOE
Chow Institute
User Center
中
EN
About WISE
People
Committee of Academic Consultants
Faculty Directory
Staff Directory
Research
Publications
Working Papers
Facilities&Centers
Education
Overview
Undergraduate Programs
Graduate Programs
Study-Abroad MA Programs
Exchange Programs
Executive Education
News & Events
News
Announcements
Conferences
Seminars & Conferences
Job Openings
SOE
Chow Institute
User Center
中
EN
About WISE
Introduction to WISE
Contact Us
Map and Direction
People
Committee of Academic Consultants
Faculty Directory
Staff Directory
Research
Publications
Working Papers
Facilities&Centers
Education
Overview
Undergraduate Programs
Graduate Programs
Study-Abroad MA Programs
Exchange Programs
Executive Education
News & Events
News
Announcements
Conferences
Seminars & Conferences
Job Openings
Research
Home
->
Research
->
Working Papers
->
Content
Research
Publications
Working Papers
Facilities&Centers
Finance & Economics Experimental Lab
MOE Key Lab in Econometrics
Fujian Provincial Key Lab in Statistics
Center for Econometrics Research
Center for Financial Research
Center for Research in Labor Economics
Center for Macroeconomics Research
Center for Statistics Research
Center for Information Technology
SAS Center for Excellence in Econometrics
High-Speed Computing Cluster
China’s Internal Borders: Evidence from the Business Cycle Correlations across Chinese Cities
Id:2016
Date:20131014
Status:published
ClickTimes:
作者
Ying Fang, Li Qi, Zhongjian Lin
正文
We measure the correlations between two cities’ real GDP growth rates (a measure of business cycle correlations) to capture the degree of segmentation across China’s provincial and regional borders. This type of segmentation can be caused by local protectionism as well as other economic and geographic factors that affect business cycle correlations between two cities. After controlling these other factors, we are able to pin down the border effect that is due to local protectionism: administrative border effect. We find that the inter-provincial administrative border effect first rose and then gradually declined in the period between 1991 and 2007. Further, its increase coincided with the introduction of the Tax Sharing System reform, which started in 1994. This administrative border effect declined steadily in recent years as the tax reform was fully instituted. Our analysis shows that China’s reform path (under market-preserving federalism) did not create a persistent provincial “administrative border effect” that debilitated market forces.
JEL-Codes:
关键词:
Border effect, Market integration, Business cycle correlation
TOP